Not sure if everyone has heard or read the new directive but here it is just in case;

Changes For The Treasury Department’s HAFA Program

Supplemental Directive 11-08 Contains Important New Policy Changes for HAFA Effective Immediately!

On August 9, 2011, the Treasury Department issued Supplemental Directive 11-08 for its HAFA program. The new policy changes and clarifications of previous HAFA policies are as follows:

  • Borrowers are currently provided with a 14-day period to respond to a servicer’s invitation to participate in the HAFA program. The 14 calendar day period response time is only intended to give the borrower a guaranteed minimum time period to respond to the servicer. It is not meant to that if the borrower elects to participate in HAFA after the 14-day period that they are not eligible. Servicers may consider a borrower for HAFA whether or not they respond within the 14-day period.
  • Unless prohibited by investor rules, servicers should utilize the HAFA program rather than a lender’s or servicer’s proprietary short sale process in all cases where a short sale is approved by the servicer and the transaction meets the guidelines of the HAFA program.
  • It is clarified that the aggregate cap of $6,000 that is available to satisfy subordinate liens applies only to subordinate liens that are secured by a mortgage on the subject property. The $6,000 cap is not applicable to non-mortgaged subordinate liens such as mechanics’ liens or homeowner association liens. Servicers are allowed to authorize any additional portion of the gross proceeds to be used as payment to the subordinate non-mortgage lienholders in exchange for a lien release and release of borrower liability. This means that more than $6,000 can be paid to subordinate liens as long as no more than $6,000 is paid to the mortgage liens.
  • Before October 15, 2011, each servicer must develop and implement procedures that the servicer will follow to periodically to reevaluate property value and to reconcile discrepancies between the servicer’s market value estimate or BPO and the market value data provided by the borrower or the borrower’s real estate broker.
  • The term “Minimum Acceptable Net Proceeds” in a HAFA Short Sale Agreement does not really mean it is the minimum amount that must be netted from the short sale. The new supplemental directive clarifies that servicers are not prohibited from accepting a purchase offer that would result in net proceeds less than the previously stated minimum acceptable net proceeds if the servicer determines that the proposed sale is in the best interest of the investor.
  • Borrowers may use their $3,000 relocation incentive to pay for transaction costs that the borrower has instructed the closing agent in writing to pay, such as the cost of legal representation, overdue utility bills or minor repairs identified during the property inspection. However, borrowers may not use the relocation incentive to pay for the release of subordinate or non-mortgage liens recorded against the property and borrowers may not be required by the servicer, as a condition of the sale, to utilize the relocation incentive to pay any transaction expenses.
  • Servicers must, no later than October 15, 2011, complete and post on their websites a HAFA matrix explaining their HAFA program in a format that can be used to compare it with other servicers’ HAFA programs. The matrix is intended to assist the borrowers and their real estate agents in understanding any unique components of the particular servicer’s HAFA policy or any differences in the HAFA policy of a particular lender. The Treasury Department will post on the MakingHomeAffordable.gov website information for the public about the web location of each servicer’s HAFA matrix. This is intended to make it easy for borrowers and their agents to identify in advance any different requirements between the various servicers’ HAFA policies.
  •  

    The intent of the new policies is to make the HAFA short sale process easier for borrowers and their agents by making the differing servicer policies more transparent, to allow more flexibility in how the borrower’s funds are dispersed and by providing the ability to pay additional funds to non-mortgage lienholders for lien releases. Hopefully, they will have that effect.

    More information on these changes, the new forms that will be issued to comply with them, and other information relevant to these HAFA policy updates will be posted in the CHP members’ section of this website shortly.

Views: 204

Replies to This Discussion

wow this is great news. I have had so many nightmares. So I am hoping the borrower can use the 3K fro HOA dues that hafa does not pay.
Slowly getting a little better.

Good info Becky.

The first bullet point is actually a welcome clarification.

The 2nd bullet point, I guess Bank of America didn't get the memo: instead of defaulting to HAFA, I have one file where the Equator message from the negotiator was 'we took this file out of HAFA. If the seller still wants HAFA he ahs to call in again'.  Outrageous the arrogance.

Fannie Mae is unimpressed with HAFA - or telling congress to take a leap? I just received this in a BOA letter to a home owner (the investor is FNMA):

"Per the federal government's guidelines you are not eligible for HAFA at this time because:

Investor Guarantor not participating.

   *   We service your loan on behalf of an investor or group of investors who are not participating in the HAFA

        Short Sale or HAFA Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Program."

I believe that Freddie Mac has the same policy as FNMA, but don't know for sure.

Fannie and Freddie have their own HAFA program from what I understand. look at Treasury  Supplemental

Directive 09-09. I am not sure but think this is Freddie's guidelines. This could have changed a bit but, I do refer to this a lot when I pursue a Freddie short Sale. 

 

Thanks very much for the updated info regarding the new HAFA Directive.  I just closed a HAFA case, but now face a tough challenge.  A local Federal Savings Bank is refusing to do anything with my latest short sale client until we have an offer, then we have to complete  the usual package and ask for approval, and wait, and wait.  Do lenders have to offer HAFA, or is voluntary?  Is there any way around this lender's antiquated position?  Thanks!
I don't think that the servicer has that much say - if the investor does HAFA, then the servicer better do what the investor says.  You might learn more by finding who the investor is and then contacting them.  Also, you **might** get some better direction from HOPE - maybe a last shot attempt there..

RSS

Short Sale Lead Machine


Short Sale Agents

~ JOIN US ~

We Refer Thousands of

Listings to agents like YOU!

_____________________

Customer Service (877)737-4903

Contact our support staff CLICK HERE

___________________

 

____________________

Realtor Short Sale Training Program

____________________

FOLLOW US!

 

 

 

______________________

Always seek legal advice and representation.  The Short Sale Specialist Network and First Coast Realty Associates assume no responsibility for the content of this website.

____________________

Jacksonville Real Estate Short Sale Help CA Short Sale

____________________

Discussion Forum

HAFA government short sale program Successes and Failures

Started by Mike Linkenauger. Last reply by Terry L. Osburn, SFR Apr 1. 7 Replies

NEW RMA form

Started by Steven Pawera. Last reply by Steven Pawera Mar 23. 3 Replies

HAFA program extended and new guidelines announced

Started by Mike Linkenauger. Last reply by Tamilyn Simard Mar 15. 10 Replies

BofA HAFA and FNMA Investor

Started by Tamilyn Simard. Last reply by Kevin - Greenville, SC Dec 14, 2011. 7 Replies

HAFA & NO seller closing costs!

Started by Wendy Smith Nov 14, 2011. 0 Replies

OCWEN violating HAFA guidelines?

Started by Jennie Blackburn, Realtor, CDPE,. Last reply by Jennie Blackburn, Realtor, CDPE, Nov 9, 2011. 9 Replies

Short Sale Closing Extensions are NOT easy with Bank of America HAFA

Started by Sara Mehrpouyan Los Angeles CDPE. Last reply by Joe Beauchamp Oct 28, 2011. 1 Reply

© 2012   Created by Mike Linkenauger.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service